Report summary
When the Faculty of Industrial Engineering Novo mesto was founded, its vision stated,
among other things, that it wanted to become a recognised and distinctive higher education
institution in the field of engineering sciences with a focus on achieving a high quality level
of teaching, scientific research and professional work, continuous improvement of the
educational and academic structure of staff and the knowledge of graduates, the
development of innovative and internationally comparable study and research
programmes, and intensive international cooperation with links to the global education and
research space.
The Master's degree programme in Engineering and Automotive Industry was launched at
FINI in the academic year 2016/17. If the title of the programme could be attributed to
innovation, this unfortunately cannot be said of its content, especially as the Faculty
repeatedly promotes it as a degree in mechanical engineering, although in terms of content
and international comparability this is certainly not the case. Neither is the institution's
scientific research activity, which must be the cornerstone of the study process at the
Master's study level, internationally comparable. The two main reasons for the
unsatisfactory level of scientific research are inadequate staffing and inadequate material
conditions, both in terms of the financial resources available and in terms of the research
equipment available.
While enrolment figures have been fairly stable in recent years, with the total number of
students hovering around 20, it is worrying to note that this academic year only two
students are enrolled in the first year of the programme.
The programme under assessment is delivered as a part-time programme, mainly by
distance learning. It is very difficult to speak of a combined form of study, as most of the
laboratory exercises, which are already very sparsely timetabled in the curricula, are also
carried out at a distance, which is unacceptable in a technical course. The recent curriculum
overhaul, which was carried out without a thorough analysis of the existing situation and
has not yet been put into practice, has not brought about any significant improvement in
this area. On the other hand, by changing the programme's orientation from automotive
to sustainable economy, it represents a departure from the strategic objectives set without
documented reasons and without a revision of the strategic documents, including a change
in the programme's name.
Given the material conditions, which do not allow the second degree programme to achieve
an adequate level of scientific research and teaching, and the available human resources,
which are too limited for a serious approach to the development and implementation of the
Master's degree programme, insisting on the implementation of the programme under
review is a burden that prevents the institution from focusing all its energy on developing
an activity for which it realistically has the appropriate conditions, which it should make
better use of. We believe that a thorough self-evaluation of the study programme, involving
all stakeholders, would show the same conclusion. There are simply too many serious
shortcomings in this report that cannot be ignored and cannot be remedied in a shorter
period of time, because some of the key ones, such as the lack of adequate staff, are also
beyond the direct influence of the institution.