Report summary
The interdisciplinary Master's degree study programme Industrial Engineering, which is
driven by three member faculties of the University of Maribor, according to the assessment
of a group of experts in the field of Internal Quality Assurance and I mprovement of the
study programme fully meets both quality standards. The quality monitoring and assurance
system is already functioning well and efficiently at each of the faculties involved, from the
collection of information from all stakeholders, to the assessment and proposal of measures
and actions, to the monitoring of measures and the communication of information to
stakeholders, while mutual coordination and cooperation is effectively organised within the
GING Council. However, based on interviews with stakeholders, we note that individual
stakeholders do not use all available channels to provide their comments and suggestions
for changes to the implementation of the study programme and, in particular, do not follow
up the existing methods of informing stakeholders of the actions taken with sufficient
regularity and thoroughness. Additional efforts by the faculty management and programme
coordinators to involve them more actively could provide an opportunity to involve even
more stakeholders actively and thus improve the process in the future. In the area of
Curriculum Change and Update, we note that the changes and updates to the curriculum
in recent years have not represented a major change in the structure, scope or
implementation of the curriculum. This is due to a well -designed and attractive study
programme, which combines technical and economic content in a meaningful way, enabling
graduates to be broadly knowledgeable, skilled and sought-after in the labour market. In
the third area, Curriculum Implementation, the programme assessed fully meets both
standards. A particularly effective solution is the organisation of the timetable, with a clear
separation of duties in the two faculties on different days. Nevertheless, we identified
certain opportunities that could further improve the implementation of the study
programme. While student attendance at lectures in particular often depends on the
students' own interest, we would certainly suggest reflecting on methods and forms of
work that would further engage students. Some challenges in the area of staffing were
perceived in the workload of teaching assistants of all three members and non-teaching
staff at the FGPA, but this did not have a significant impact on the quality of the
implementation of the study programme. There is also some inconsistency in the
information about the study programme on the separate websites of the three participating
faculties. Based on the assessment, we conclude that the interdisciplinary Master's degree
study programme in Industrial Engineering is a programme that is regularly and effectively
developed and implemented adequately, thus meeting all the standards of the assessment.
At the same time, we have not detected any really special breakthroughs or distinct
excellence in any of the fields.