Report summary
The interdisciplinary first cycle Bachelor's degree study programme Industrial Engineering,
which is driven by three member faculties of the University of Maribor, according to the
assessment of a group of experts in the field of Internal Quality Assurance and
Improvement of the study programme fully meets both quality standards. The quality
monitoring and assurance system is already functioning well and efficiently at each of the
faculties involved, from the collection of information from all stakeholders, to the
assessment and proposal of measures and actions, to the monitoring of measures and the
communication of information to stakeholders, while mutual coordination and cooperation
is effectively organised within the GING Council. However, based on interviews with
stakeholders, we note that individual stakeholders do not use all available channels to
provide their comments and suggestions for changes to the implementation of the study
programme and, in particular, do not follow up the existing methods of informing
stakeholders of the actions taken with sufficient regularity and thoroughness. Additional
efforts by the faculty management and programme coordinators to involve them more
actively could provide an opportunity to involve even more stakeholders actively and thus
improve the process in the future. In the area of Curriculum Change and Update, we note
that the changes and updates to the curriculum in recent years have not represented a
major change in the structure, scope or implementation of the curriculum. This is due to a
well-designed and attractive study programme, which combines technical and economic
content in a meaningful way, enabling graduates to be broadly knowledgeable, skilled and
sought-after in the labour market. In the third area, Curriculum Implementation, the
programme assessed fully meets both standards. A particularly effective solution is the
organisation of the timetable, with a clear separation of duties in the two faculties on
different days. Nevertheless, we identified certain opportunities that could further improve
the implementation of the study programme. While student attendance at lectures in
particular often depends on the students' own interest, we would certainly suggest
reflecting on methods and forms of work that would further engage students. Some
challenges in the area of staffing were perceived in the workload of teaching assistants of
all three members and non-teaching staff at the FGPA, but this did not have a significant
impact on the quality of the implementation of the study programme. There is also some
inconsistency in the information about the study programme on the separate websites of
the three participating faculties. Based on the assessment, we conclude that the
interdisciplinary Bachelor's degree study programme in Industrial Engineering is a
programme that is regularly and effectively developed and implemented adequately, thus
meeting all the standards of the assessment. At the same time, we have not detected any
really special breakthroughs or distinct excellence in any of the fields.