Mikkeli University Consortium

Mikkelin yliopistokeskus

Basic information

National External Quality Assurance Requirements

External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions

Institutional level

Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, University of Helsinki
  • DEQAR Report ID
    86134
  • Agency
    Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC)
  • Type
    Thematic evaluations
  • Status
    voluntary
  • Formal decision
    not applicable
  • Date
    09/01/2023
  • Valid until
    not applicable
  • Summary

    Report summary

    Julkaisu on yhteenveto Kansallisen koulutuksen arviointikeskuksen (Karvi) korkeakoulujen kolmannen auditointikierroksen (2018–2024) puolivälin tuloksista. Seuraava yhteenveto tehdään kolmannen auditointikierroksen lopussa. Yhteenvedon tarkoituksenaon tuottaa kokonaiskuva korkeakoulujen toiminnasta ja laadunhallinnasta auditointiraporttien perusteella. Korkeakoulujen auditointeja on toteutettu Suomessa vuodesta2005 lähtien.​
    Julkaisu on yhteenveto Kansallisen koulutuksen arviointikeskuksen (Karvi) korkeakoulujen kolmannen auditointikierroksen (2018–2024) puolivälin tuloksista. Seuraava yhteenveto tehdään kolmannen auditointikierroksen lopussa. Yhteenvedon tarkoituksenaon tuottaa kokonaiskuva korkeakoulujen toiminnasta ja laadunhallinnasta auditointiraporttien perusteella. Korkeakoulujen auditointeja on toteutettu Suom...
  • Report and decision
  • Permalink
    https://data.deqar.eu/report/86134
  • Agency's identifier
    TIIVISTELMÄT 14:2022
  • External link
    View record on agency’s website
  • Verifiable Credential
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki

Programme level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Advanced Structural Design and Robotised Welding (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Biorefineries (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Biorefineries (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Chemical and Process Engineering (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Chemical and Process Engineering (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Chemical Engineering (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Chemical Engineering (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Chemical Engineering (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Chemical Engineering (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Chemical Engineering (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Chemical Engineering (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Chemical Engineering (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Chemical Engineering for Water Treatment (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Computer Science (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Computer Science (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Computer Science (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Computer Science (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Computer Science (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Computer Science (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Electrical Engineering (first cycle degree)

Verifiable Credentials

A Verifiable Credential (VC) is a digitally-signed and thus tamper-evident document containing information on a subject (e.g. personal information, entitlements of an individual, degrees held by an individual or accreditation of a higher education institution). Quality assurance results recorded in DEQAR can be downloaded as W3C-compatible Verifiable Credentials.

Currently, two types of credentials can be issued:

EBSI Verifiable Accreditations (VA) can be used by a higher education institution in the context of the EBSI Early Adopters programme.

  • The VA allows the institution to prove its external quality assurance on the Trusted Issuer Registry (TIR). EBSI VAs are only issued for external quality assurance results with an official status in a national system (“part of obligatory EQA system”).
  • At present, the higher education institution’s EBSI DID needs to be communicated to EQAR and recorded in DEQAR manually at the moment. If you are a higher education institution participating in EBSI, please contact us to register your DID.
  • EBSI VAs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:ebsi:zk4bhCepWSYp9RhZkRPiwUL.

DEQAR Format Verifiable Credentials primarily serve as a proof of concept and public demonstrator currently.

  • DEQAR Format VCs are based on the plain W3C Recommendation and our own data model. While they closely follow the EBSI Schema, no EBSI-specific or EU-specific elements or data types are used.
  • The higher education institution is identified by its DEQAR URI in this case.
  • DEQAR Format VCs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:web:data.deqar.eu.

Please note: this is an experimental feature.