Mikkeli University Consortium

Mikkelin yliopistokeskus

Basic information

National External Quality Assurance Requirements

External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions

Institutional level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Aalto University
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT University)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Helsinki
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Aalto University
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT University)
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Helsinki
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Aalto University
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT University), University of Helsinki
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT University), University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT University)
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (LUT University)
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University
Thematic evaluation, Aalto University
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki

Programme level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Electrical Engineering (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Electrical Engineering (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Electrical Engineering (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Energy Conversion (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Energy Systems (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Energy Technology (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Energy Technology (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Energy Technology (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Environmental Technology (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Environmental Technology (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Global Management of Innovation and Technology (second cycle degree)
Decision: positive
Global Management of Innovation and Technology (second cycle degree)
Decision: positive
Global Management of Innovation and Technology (second cycle degree)
Decision: positive Joint programme
ICT Innovation (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Industrial Engineering and Management (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Mechanical Engineering (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Mechanical Engineering (first cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Mechatronic System Design (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Mechatronic System Design (second cycle degree)
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Nuclear Engineering (second cycle degree)

Verifiable Credentials

A Verifiable Credential (VC) is a digitally-signed and thus tamper-evident document containing information on a subject (e.g. personal information, entitlements of an individual, degrees held by an individual or accreditation of a higher education institution). Quality assurance results recorded in DEQAR can be downloaded as W3C-compatible Verifiable Credentials.

Currently, two types of credentials can be issued:

EBSI Verifiable Accreditations (VA) can be used by a higher education institution in the context of the EBSI Early Adopters programme.

  • The VA allows the institution to prove its external quality assurance on the Trusted Issuer Registry (TIR). EBSI VAs are only issued for external quality assurance results with an official status in a national system (“part of obligatory EQA system”).
  • At present, the higher education institution’s EBSI DID needs to be communicated to EQAR and recorded in DEQAR manually at the moment. If you are a higher education institution participating in EBSI, please contact us to register your DID.
  • EBSI VAs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:ebsi:zk4bhCepWSYp9RhZkRPiwUL.

DEQAR Format Verifiable Credentials primarily serve as a proof of concept and public demonstrator currently.

  • DEQAR Format VCs are based on the plain W3C Recommendation and our own data model. While they closely follow the EBSI Schema, no EBSI-specific or EU-specific elements or data types are used.
  • The higher education institution is identified by its DEQAR URI in this case.
  • DEQAR Format VCs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:web:data.deqar.eu.

Please note: this is an experimental feature.