Kajaani University Consortium

Kajaanin yliopistokeskus

Basic information

National External Quality Assurance Requirements

External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions

Institutional level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Oulu
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Eastern Finland
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Lapland
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Jyväskylä
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Eastern Finland
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Jyväskylä
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Lapland
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Eastern Finland
  • DEQAR Report ID
    86133
  • Agency
    Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC)
  • Type
    Institutional quality audits
  • Status
    part of obligatory EQA system
  • Formal decision
    positive
  • Date
    03/03/2023
  • Valid until
    03/03/2029
  • Summary

    Report summary

    Audit of the Universityof Eastern Finland 2/95AbstractTitle of publicationAudit of the University of Eastern FinlandAuthorsEva Åkesson, Marc Perkins, Jürgen Seifried, Anni Siltanen, Mira Huusko and Hanna Väätäinen.Self-assessment of the University of Eastern Finland (eds.) Saila Vaittinen, Anu Arosanervo, SoiliMakkonen and Maija Lahtela-KakkonenThe Higher Education Evaluation Committee’s decisionThe University of Eastern Finland passed the audit on 3 March 2023.The Quality Label is valid until 3 March 2029.The audit team’s evaluation of the evaluation areas I-IIII: HEI creates competence: good levelII: HEI promotes impact and renewal: good levelIII: HEI enhances quality and well-being: good levelHEI as a learning organisation – evaluation area chosen by the Universityof Eastern FinlandUEF as a study and work environment for international students and employeesTheme and partner for benchlearningTheme: Continuous learning incl. stakeholder cooperation.Partner: The University of Jyväskylä
    Audit of the Universityof Eastern Finland 2/95AbstractTitle of publicationAudit of the University of Eastern FinlandAuthorsEva Åkesson, Marc Perkins, Jürgen Seifried, Anni Siltanen, Mira Huusko and Hanna Väätäinen.Self-assessment of the University of Eastern Finland (eds.) Saila Vaittinen, Anu Arosanervo, SoiliMakkonen and Maija Lahtela-KakkonenThe Higher Education Evaluation Committee’s decisionT...
  • Notes
    FINEEC's audit reports are meant to be read on FINEEC's digital audit platform https://auditoinnit.karvi.fi/auditoinnit/en/. This PDF is a printout of the website.
  • Report and decision
  • Permalink
    https://data.deqar.eu/report/86133
  • Agency's identifier
    7:2023
  • External link
    View record on agency’s website
  • Verifiable Credential
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Jyväskylä, University of Lapland, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Jyväskylä, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Jyväskylä, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Jyväskylä, University of Lapland
Thematic evaluation, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Jyväskylä, University of Oulu
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Jyväskylä, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Oulu
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Jyväskylä, University of Lapland, University of Oulu
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Eastern Finland, University of Jyväskylä, University of Lapland, University of Oulu

Programme level

Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions Joint programme
European Forestry (second cycle degree)
Decision: positive
Programmes in Electronics and Communications Engineering (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • EUR-ACE
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions Joint programme
Redesigning the Post-Industrial City (second cycle degree)
Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions Joint programme
Superdiversity in Education, Organisations and Society (second cycle degree)

Verifiable Credentials

A Verifiable Credential (VC) is a digitally-signed and thus tamper-evident document containing information on a subject (e.g. personal information, entitlements of an individual, degrees held by an individual or accreditation of a higher education institution). Quality assurance results recorded in DEQAR can be downloaded as W3C-compatible Verifiable Credentials.

Currently, two types of credentials can be issued:

EBSI Verifiable Accreditations (VA) can be used by a higher education institution in the context of the EBSI Early Adopters programme.

  • The VA allows the institution to prove its external quality assurance on the Trusted Issuer Registry (TIR). EBSI VAs are only issued for external quality assurance results with an official status in a national system (“part of obligatory EQA system”).
  • At present, the higher education institution’s EBSI DID needs to be communicated to EQAR and recorded in DEQAR manually at the moment. If you are a higher education institution participating in EBSI, please contact us to register your DID.
  • EBSI VAs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:ebsi:zk4bhCepWSYp9RhZkRPiwUL.

DEQAR Format Verifiable Credentials primarily serve as a proof of concept and public demonstrator currently.

  • DEQAR Format VCs are based on the plain W3C Recommendation and our own data model. While they closely follow the EBSI Schema, no EBSI-specific or EU-specific elements or data types are used.
  • The higher education institution is identified by its DEQAR URI in this case.
  • DEQAR Format VCs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:web:data.deqar.eu.

Please note: this is an experimental feature.