University Consortium of Seinäjoki

Seinäjoen yliopistokeskus

Basic information

National External Quality Assurance Requirements

External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions

Institutional level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Turku
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Tampere
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: negative
Institutional audit, University of Turku
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Helsinki
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Tampere University of Technology
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: negative
Institutional audit, University of Tampere
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Sibelius Academy
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Vaasa
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Helsinki
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional audit, University of Turku
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki, University of Tampere, University of Turku
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki, University of Turku
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki, University of Tampere, University of Turku, University of Vaasa
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki, University of Tampere, University of Turku, University of Vaasa
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki, University of Tampere, University of Turku, University of Vaasa
Thematic evaluation, University of Tampere, University of Turku, University of Vaasa
Thematic evaluation, University of Tampere, University of Turku, University of Vaasa
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Thematic evaluation, University of Helsinki, University of Tampere, University of Turku
Thematic evaluation, University of Tampere, University of Turku

Programme level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
DEGREE PROGRAMMES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Diplomi-insinöörin tut-kinto, Energia- ja informaatio-tekniikan ohjelma (second cycle degree)
  • Other names
    • Energy and Information Technology
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science in Technology
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Diplomi-insinöörin tut-kinto, Energia- ja informaatio-tekniikan ohjelma (second cycle degree)
  • Other names
    • Energy and Information Technology
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science in Technology
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive Joint programme
ICT Innovation (second cycle degree)
Decision: positive
Industrial Management (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Industrial Management and Information Systems (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor of Science
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Industrial Management and Information Systems (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor of Science
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Industrial Systems Analytics (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science in Technology
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Industrial Systems Analytics (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science in Technology
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Information Systems (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Information Systems (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Technical Communication (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Technical Communication (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master of Science
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Tekniikan kandidaatin-tutkinto, Energia- ja informaatio-tekniikan ohjelma (first cycle degree)
  • Other names
    • Energy and Information Technology
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor of Science in Technology
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Tekniikan kandidaatin-tutkinto, Energia- ja informaatio-tekniikan ohjelma (first cycle degree)
  • Other names
    • Energy and Information Technology
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor of Science in Technology
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by
Decision: positive
Veterinary Medicine (degree)
  • Qualification/award
  • Level
    -
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Offered by

Verifiable Credentials

A Verifiable Credential (VC) is a digitally-signed and thus tamper-evident document containing information on a subject (e.g. personal information, entitlements of an individual, degrees held by an individual or accreditation of a higher education institution). Quality assurance results recorded in DEQAR can be downloaded as W3C-compatible Verifiable Credentials.

Currently, two types of credentials can be issued:

EBSI Verifiable Accreditations (VA) can be used by a higher education institution in the context of the EBSI Early Adopters programme.

  • The VA allows the institution to prove its external quality assurance on the Trusted Issuer Registry (TIR). EBSI VAs are only issued for external quality assurance results with an official status in a national system (“part of obligatory EQA system”).
  • At present, the higher education institution’s EBSI DID needs to be communicated to EQAR and recorded in DEQAR manually at the moment. If you are a higher education institution participating in EBSI, please contact us to register your DID.
  • EBSI VAs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:ebsi:zk4bhCepWSYp9RhZkRPiwUL.

DEQAR Format Verifiable Credentials primarily serve as a proof of concept and public demonstrator currently.

  • DEQAR Format VCs are based on the plain W3C Recommendation and our own data model. While they closely follow the EBSI Schema, no EBSI-specific or EU-specific elements or data types are used.
  • The higher education institution is identified by its DEQAR URI in this case.
  • DEQAR Format VCs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:web:data.deqar.eu.

Please note: this is an experimental feature.